Judge, W., & Hill, L. (2010). Change management: Power and influence. Retrieved from http://hbr.org/product/change-management-harvard-managementor- online-modu/an/6789E-HTM-ENG?Ntt= change%2520management%2520power%2520and%2520influence
In this single-player simulation produced by Harvard Business Publishing in Boston, students play one of two roles at a sunglass manufacturing firm and face the challenges associated with implementing an organization-wide environmental sustainability initiative. The initiative seeks to change raw material inputs in order to make the company’s products more “green” and also to address environmental waste issues. The simulation includes up to four scenarios with different combinations of two important factors for creating change: the relative power of the change agent and the relative urgency associated with the change initiative. In each scenario, students choose among different change levers in an attempt to persuade key members of the organization to adopt the change initiative. Students are assessed on their ability to achieve the greatest percentage of adopters within the company while simultaneously using the fewest resources. Appropriate for use in undergraduate, graduate, and executive business programs.
ExperiencePoint. (2010). Experience change simulations. Retrieved from http://www.experiencepoint.com/
In this single-player simulation produced by ExperiencePoint in Toronto, students play the role of a change agent in four different organizational contexts. For the GlobalTech simulation, players lead change in a siloed organization that needs to be more customer focused. For the SkyTech simulation, players lead a corporate social responsibility initiative in a global corporation. For the Lakeview simulation, players implement lean practices to reduce patient wait times in a hospital emergency department. For the Central-Valley view simulation, players balance the needs of internal and external stakeholders as they lead the merger of two hospitals.
Beer, M., & Eisenstadt, R. (1994). Developing an organization capable of implementing strategy and learning. Human Relations, 49, 597–620.
Bennett, J. L. (2000). Leading the edge of change: Building individual and organizational capacity for the evolving nature of change. Mooresville, NC: Paw Print Press.
Bethune, G. (1998). From worst to first: Behind the scenes of Continental’s remarkable comeback. New York, NY: Wiley.
Bishop, C. (2000). Making change happen one person at a time: Assessing change capacity within your organization. New York, NY: AMACON.
Collins, J., & Porras, J. (1994). Built to last: Successful habits of visionary companies. New York, NY: HarperBusiness.
Dell, M. (2000). Direct from Dell: Strategies that revolutionized an industry. New York, NY: HarperBusiness.
Fullan, M. (2008). The six secrets of change: What the best leaders do to help their organizations survive and thrive. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
Gardner, H. (2004). Changing minds: The art and science of changing our own and other people’s minds. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press.
Gerstner, L. (2002). Who says elephants can’t dance? New York, NY: HarperBusiness.
Hock, D. (2005). One from many: VISA and the rise of chaordic organization. San Francisco, CA: Berrett-Koehler.
Judge, W., & Blocker, C. (2008). Organizational capacity for change and strategic ambidexterity: Flying the plane while rewiring it. European Journal of Marketing, 42(9/10), 915–926.
Judge, W., & Douglas, T. (2009). The evolution of the organizational capacity for change construct. Journal of Organizational Change Management, 22(6), 635–649.
Judge, W., & Elenkov, D. (2005). Organizational capacity for change and environmental performance: An empirical assessment of Bulgarian firms. Journal of Business Research, 58, 894–901.
Judge, W., Naoumova, I., Douglas, T., & Kouzevol, N. (2009). Organizational capacity for change and firm performance in Russia. International Journal of Human Resource Management, 20(8), 1737–1752.
Lawler, E., & Worley, C. (2006). Built to change: How to achieve sustained organizational effectiveness. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
Lengnick-Hall, C., & Beck, T. (2005). Adaptive fit versus robust transformation: How organizations respond to environmental change. Journal of Management, 31(5), 738–757.
Price Waterhouse. (1996). The paradox principles: How high performance companies manage chaos, complexity, and contradiction to achieve superior results. Chicago, IL: Irwin.
Seidman, D. (2007). How: Why how we do anything means everything in business (and in life). Hoboken, NJ: Wiley
Staber, U., & Sydow, J. (2002). Organizational adaptive capacity: A structuration perspective. Journal of Management Inquiry, 11, 408–424.
Thames, R., & Webster, D. (2009). Chasing change: Building organizational capacity in a turbulent environment. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.
Case ID: HBS 492023
Trustworthy leadership: Ken Weatherford
Trusting followers: Union turmoil
Capable champions: Sandy Ward
Involved midmanagement: Ad hoc teams
Systems thinking: Guiding coalition
Communication systems: Multichannel
Accountable culture: Avoid plant closing
Innovative culture: Products and processes
Case ID: HBS 409061
Trustworthy leadership: John Chambers
Capable champions: Customer champions
Systems thinking: IT systems
Accountable culture: Customer focus
Case ID: HBS 308001
Trustworthy leadership: Chuck Prince
Systems thinking: Merger challenge
Communication systems: Problem area
Accountable culture: Problem area
Innovative culture: Problem area
Case ID: HBS 401049
Trustworthy leadership: Trip Hawkins
Capable champions: Problem area
Involved midmanagement: Problem area
Systems thinking: E-mail, meetings
Communication systems: Venture burn rate
Accountable culture: Growth potential
Case ID: HBS 401024
Trustworthy leadership: Meg Whitman
Involved midmanagement: Fully engaged
Systems thinking: Acquire Krause?
Accountable culture: Problem Area
Innovative culture: Customer focus
Case ID: HBS 410002
Trustworthy leadership: Biswaranjan Sen
Trusting followers: Union turmoil
Capable champions: Suchita Prasan
Systems thinking: Problem area
Communication systems: Problem area
Accountable culture: Extreme downsizing
Innovative culture: British hierarchy
Case ID: HBS 499054
Trustworthy leadership: Ray Gilmartin
Capable champions: Mgt. committee
Involved midmanagement: Functional silos
Systems thinking: Merger challenge
Communication systems: Problem area
Accountable culture: Problem area
Innovative culture: Drug creation
Case ID: HBS 491036
Trustworthy leadership: Steve Rothmeir
Trusting followers: Union turmoil
Capable champions: Dr. Ken Myers
Involved midmanagement: Merger integration
Systems thinking: Merger challenge
Communication systems: Problem area
Accountable culture: Problem area
Innovative culture: Problem area
Case ID: IMD 079
Trustworthy leadership: Lars Kolind
Trusting followers: Relocation Resistance
Capable champions: Sten Davidsen
Involved midmanagement: Problem area
Accountable culture: Problem area
Innovative culture: Problem area
Case ID: MBS 309030
Trustworthy leadership: A. G. Lafley
Trusting followers: Problem area
Involved midmanagement: Walk the talk
Communication systems: Problem area
Accountable culture: Global integration
Innovative culture: Problem area
Case ID: TB 0047
Trustworthy leadership: Louis Schweitzer
Trusting followers: Downsizing
Capable champions: Carlos Ghosn
Involved midmanagement: Cultural differences
Systems thinking: Merger challenge
Communication systems: Problem area
Accountable culture: Problem area
Innovative culture: Mavericks elevated
Case ID: HBS 396203
Trustworthy leadership: Gerhard Schulmeyer
Capable champions: Mark Maletz
Involved midmanagement: Problem area
Innovative culture: Global expansion
Case ID: HBS 395055
Trustworthy leadership: Dennis Hightower
Trusting followers: Country Managers
Capable champions: Problem area
Involved midmanagement: Problem area
Systems thinking: European integration
Communication systems: Group vs. individual
Accountable culture: Problem area
Innovative culture: Growth potential
Case ID: SGBS L-15
Trustworthy leadership: Micahel Kamarck
Capable champions: Guiding coalition
Systems thinking: Learning teams
Communication systems: Multichannel
Accountable culture: Cut costs 25% in 1 year