President Fillmore and the Compromise of 1850 - Answers
The answers are in BOLD below.
NOTE: The transcript from the video is listed below the quiz for your reference.
1. Which was NOT a part of the Compromise of 1850?
- The slave trade was abolished in Washington D.C.
- Texas gained land from the eastern part of New Mexico.
- Utah and New Mexico would decide slavery by popular sovereignty.
- The Fugitive Slave Law was passed.
- California became a free state.
2. What was Stephen Douglas's role in the debate over the Compromise of 1850?
- He led the opposition to it.
- He provided the critical swing vote.
- He wrote it.
- He was the one who suggested adding the Fugitive Slave Law.
- He was the only young leader supporting it.
3. Why was California statehood controversial?
- Because it was so far away from Washington D.C.
- Because there were so many fugitive slaves living there
- Because it was so big with such a small population
- Because there was no slave state to add as a pair with it
- Because there were so many non-whites in it
4. Who represented the two extreme ends of the slavery debate?
- John Calhoun and Millard Fillmore
- Daniel Webster and Zachary Taylor
- David Wilmot and John Calhoun
- Millard Fillmore and Henry Clay
- Abraham Lincoln and Stephen Douglas
5. Which is true about the Fugitive Slave Act?
- It encouraged law enforcement to ignore runaways.
- It required citizens to help catch runaways.
- It slowed down the process of returning fugitives.
- It extended some legal rights to escaped slaves.
- It outlawed slavery in Washington D.C.
Following President Zachary Taylor's death, Millard Fillmore took office. He supported the Compromise of 1850 that added new states from the Mexican cession and attempted to resolve long-standing controversies over slavery.
The Mexican Cession: Slave or Free?
Zachary Taylor was elected president in 1848, and though he was a slaveholder himself, he opposed the spread of slavery into new territories, causing a stalemate in Congress. Then, Taylor died, and it fell to President Millard Fillmore to figure out just how to deal with the land acquired from the Treaty of Guadalupe Hidalgo, generally referred to as the Mexican cession.
In the past, Congress had successfully banned slavery in some new territories with laws, like the Northwest Ordinance and the Missouri Compromise, but by mid-century, the nation was different. Cotton had taken hold of the southern economy and lifestyle, while abolitionism was spreading throughout the north. With new land at stake in the west, the question of slavery threatened to tear the country apart, and some Americans began to question whether or not Congress really had the right to make these decisions at all.
Politicians Divide
Congress had actually been fighting over Mexican land long before the Treaty of Guadalupe Hidalgo even existed. At one side of the debate, David Wilmot proposed banning all slavery, all indentured servants, and basically, all black residents from the land. The Wilmot Proviso repeatedly passed the House of Representatives, since the northern states were more populated, but it could not pass the Senate with its careful balance of slave and free states. At the other end of the debate were southerners, like John C. Calhoun, who wanted to ensure that slavery, which he had famously defended in an 1832 speech as a 'positive good,' was guaranteed forever. After all, the territories belonged to every American. Shouldn't anyone be allowed to move there with all of his belongings - including his slaves? In the middle were the voices for popular sovereignty. Just let the people in the land decide for themselves. Isn't that what America's supposed to be about? Before his death, President Taylor suggested the new land fast-track through the territorial stage and just write the state constitutions. This famous political cartoon shows him in a very precarious position over the issue of slavery in California.
More Problems Over Slavery
All these ideas sounded good in theory, but the gold rush meant California was ready for statehood almost immediately, and no one wanted to lose control of the Senate to the other side. Unfortunately, California wasn't the only problem. Texas was claiming that its border extended west to Santa Fe. This would, of course, mean a bigger state and more representation for slave power in Congress. And then there was Washington, D.C. While almost all of the slave debate had previously focused on new territories, northern abolitionists desperately wanted to get rid of slavery in the nation's capital, including the largest slave market in North America. Congress had been working on this problem for nearly two years, yet each side just entrenched deeper.
Mid-Lesson Review
All of these facts and factors can be a bit overwhelming. So, before we go any further, let's take a moment to recall some key details:
- A lot of new land had been won in the Mexican-American War. Should it be slave or free territory?
- Throughout the middle part of the century, states had been added in pairs to maintain equal power in the Senate, but California was ready for statehood, without another state to balance it.
- Different parties had come up with ways to push their own agendas, but none of them could address all of the problems over slavery in the country, including Washington D.C. and Texas.
The Compromise of 1850
Henry Clay, nicknamed the 'Great Compromiser' after his proposal in 1820, could see that the north and south were ready to split. Finally, in January 1850, the 70-year old Kentucky Senator presented Congress with a new compromise bill. Together with two other senior statesmen (Daniel Webster from Massachusetts and John Calhoun from South Carolina), Henry Clay convinced Congress that no matter their differences, the nation was stronger if they stuck together. A new, young leader, named Stephen Douglas, championed their cause when the elder Senators were too ill to attend. When Zachary Taylor died, President Millard Fillmore threw his support behind the compromise and helped secure its passage. It took eight months to hammer out the details, and in the end, it couldn't prevent a Civil War, but for the time being, the Compromise of 1850 held the nation together.
Five laws addressed different parts of the problem and helped each side feel that it was gaining something for everything it gave up. First, California was added as a free state. To pacify the slave states, the remaining land of the Mexican cession was organized into the territories of New Mexico and Utah, with slavery to be decided by popular sovereignty at statehood. Texas gave up its western land claims in New Mexico (That's why it has such a weird shape!) but received $10 million in compensation. In Washington D.C., slavery would continue legally, but the slave markets would be closed. Finally, the most controversial part of the Compromise of 1850 was the aggressive new Fugitive Slave Act.
The Fugitive Slave Act
It was designed to make southern slaveholders feel that their right to own slaves was not being eroded. According to the new law, slaves who ran away to the north were not free, more federal officers worked claim cases and citizens were required to help track down escaped slaves. Furthermore, accused fugitives were denied trial, being processed instead by commissioners who had a financial incentive to return them to their owners. Besides the thousands of escaped slaves who were shipped back south, many truly free blacks became the victims of illegitimate claims without any legal recourse. The Fugitive Slave Act outraged abolitionists. The Underground Railroad reached its peak in the following decade, and many northern states flat out refused to comply. Even northerners, who had stayed silent before, now voiced their opposition because the federal law required their assistance in retrieving runaways.
Peace at Last?
The Compromise of 1850 was approved, and the Union was preserved for the moment. But ultimately, provisions of the compromise would be the nation's undoing. California tipped the Senate's balance of power, a fact the south could not live with permanently, and the north could not live with the Fugitive Slave Act for long. Within two years, the leading voices for moderation had all died. And in their place emerged new, young leaders, some of whom would not accept compromise on an issue as critical as human bondage.
Summary
Let's review. The question of slavery in land from the Mexican cession dominated Congress for two years. Earlier compromises couldn't address the new issues facing the nation, and factions from every side wanted their position to triumph. The aging Senator Henry Clay, who had brokered peace in 1820, crafted a detailed compromise. When President Millard Fillmore took office following Taylor's death, the deal had the support it needed to pass. The Compromise of 1850 had five points:
- California became a free state.
- Utah and New Mexico would decide the slavery issue for themselves without federal intervention.
- Texas was paid $10 million to move its border east.
- The Washington D.C. slave trade was abolished but not slave holding.
- A tough, new Fugitive Slave Act was approved.
Although the Compromise of 1850 passed, it couldn't please everyone for long.