abductive reasoning
(noun)
A type of inference in which an explanation is derived from observations.
Examples of abductive reasoning in the following topics:
-
Reasoning and Inference
- Reason is how we form inferences about the world; there are different types of reasoning, which have different advantages.
- Reason and reasoning (i.e., the ability to apply reason) are associated with thinking, cognition, and intelligence.
- Examples of abductive reasoning include a doctor making a diagnosis based on test results and a jury using evidence to pass judgment on a case: in both scenarios, there is not a 100% guarantee of correctness—just the best guess based on the available evidence.
- The difference between abductive reasoning and inductive reasoning is a subtle one; both use evidence to form guesses that are likely, but not guaranteed, to be true.
- However, abductive reasoning looks for cause-and-effect relationships, while induction seeks to determine general rules.
-
Reasoning
- We use many mental shortcuts when conducting inductive, deductive, abductive, and analogous reasoning to find a solution to a problem.
- Reason or "reasoning" is associated with thinking, cognition, and intellect.
- In order to solve problems, we utilize four major forms of reasoning: deduction, induction, abduction, and analogy.
- However, unlike deduction, induction, or abduction where at least one premise (or the conclusion) is general, analogy concerns itself only with specifics and particulars.
- Differentiate between the processes of induction, deduction, abduction, and analogy, discussing heuristics that are used in these processes
-
Psychology and the Scientific Method
- Several types of reasoning exist.
- Simple reasoning involves one reason which supports one conclusion.
- Side by side reasoning involves two independent reasons which can support one conclusion, independent of one another.
- Joint reasoning involves two reasons from which only one conclusion can be drawn.
- An assumption is an unstated reason, usually based on only partially on facts.
-
Kohlberg's Stages of Moral Development
- Moral reasoning in stage four is beyond the need for individual approval exhibited in stage three.
- Democratic government is theoretically based on stage five reasoning.
- In stage 6, moral reasoning is based on abstract reasoning using universal ethical principles.
- She argued that women are not deficient in their moral reasoning and instead proposed that males and females reason differently: girls and women focus more on staying connected and maintaining interpersonal relationships.
- This often occurs in moral dilemmas involving drinking and driving or business situations where participants have been shown to reason at a lower developmental stage, typically using more self-interest driven reasoning (i.e., stage two) than authority and social order obedience driven reasoning (i.e., stage four).
-
Problem-Solving
- Often, decisions are reached at the end of significant prior thought and reasoning.
- However, there are many situations when we decide something 'spontaneously,' with little or no time to reason.
- This leads to errors in judgment and decision-making because people tend to reason in a subjective (emotion-based) manner rather than objectively - especially when personal interests and beliefs are involved.
- Intuition phenomenology is the ability to acquire knowledge without inference and/or the use of reason.
-
Piaget's Stages of Cognitive Development
- It is characterized by the idea that children's reasoning becomes focused and logical.
- Piaget determined that in this stage, children are able to incorporate inductive reasoning, which involves drawing inferences from observations in order to make a generalization.
- In contrast, children struggle with deductive reasoning, which involves using a generalized principle in order to try to predict the outcome of an event.
- This enables children to engage in the problem-solving method of developing a hypothesis and reasoning their way to plausible solutions.
- By the end of this stage, children have developed logical and systematic thinking, are capable of deductive reasoning, and can create hypothetical ideas to explain various concepts.
-
Developmental Psychology
- Cognitive development involves learning, attention, memory, language, thinking, reasoning, and creativity.
- Jean Piaget proposed a theory of cognitive development that explains how children think and reason as they move through various stages.
-
Defining Thoughts
- Researchers have studied thinking in the form of reasoning, how people make decisions and choices or solve problems, and how people engage in creative discovery and imaginative thought.
- The final stage involves an increase in logic, the ability to use deductive reasoning, and an understanding of abstract ideas.
-
Cognitive Development in Adolescence
- This allows an individual to think and reason with a wider perspective.
- This stage of cognitive development, termed by Piaget as the formal operational stage, marks a movement from an ability to think and reason from concrete visible events to an ability to think hypothetically and entertain what-if possibilities about the world.
- An individual can solve problems through abstract concepts and utilize hypothetical and deductive reasoning.
-
Executive Function and Control
- "Executive function" is an umbrella term for the management, regulation, and control of cognitive processes, including working memory, reasoning, problem solving, social inhibition, planning, and execution.
- Dorsolateral prefrontal cortex: associated with verbal and design fluency, set shifts, planning, response inhibition, working memory, organizational skills, reasoning, problem solving, and abstract thinking.