mcconnell v. federal election commission

(noun)

In McConnell v. Federal Election Commission, the United States Supreme Court upheld the constitutionality of most of the Bipartisan Campaign Reform Act of 2002 (BCRA).

Related Terms

Examples of mcconnell v. federal election commission in the following topics:

  • The Bipartisan Campaign Reform Act of 2002

    • However, in December 2003, the Supreme Court upheld most of the legislation in McConnell v.
    • Federal Election Commission.
    • In McConnell v.
    • Federal Election Commission, the United States Supreme Court upheld the constitutionality of most of the Bipartisan Campaign Reform Act of 2002 (BCRA).
    • In Federal Election Commission v.

  • The Federal Election Campaign Act

    • The amendment also created the Federal Election Commission (FEC), an independent agency responsible for regulating campaign finance legislation .
    • The 1974 amendments also established the Federal Election Commission (FEC) to enforce the law, facilitate disclosure, and administer the public funding program.
    • In Buckley v.
    • Following Buckley v.
    • In 1979, the Commission ruled that political parties could spend unregulated or "soft" money for non-federal administrative and party building activities.

  • Citizens United v. Federal Election Commission

    • Citizens United v.
    • Federal Election Commission was a landmark United States Supreme Court case in 2010 in which the court held that the First Amendment prohibited the government from restricting independent political expenditures by corporations and unions.
    • Citizens United v.
    • Analyze the significance of the Supreme Court's decision in Citizens United v.
    • Federal Election Commission for campaign finance reform

  • The Shifting Boundary between Federal and State Authority

    • Actor Ronald Reagan gained popularity by supporting Proposition 14, and was later elected governor of California.
    • Supreme Court's Reitman v.
    • The latter is in violation of federal law.
    • In Gonzales v.
    • In Gonzales v.

  • PACs and Campaigns

    • At the federal level, an organization becomes a PAC when it receives or spends more than $1,000 for the purpose of influencing a federal election, according to the Federal Election Campaign Act.
    • In 2010, the United States Supreme Court held in Citizens United v.
    • Federal Election Commission that laws prohibiting corporate and union political expenditures were unconstitutional.
    • Congress prohibited labor unions or corporations from spending money to influence federal elections, and prohibited labor unions from contributing to candidate campaigns.
    • In 1974, Amendments to FECA defined how a PAC could operate and established the Federal Election Commission (FEC) to enforce the nation's campaign finance laws.

  • Judicial Review and Marbury v. Madison

    • Marbury v.
    • Marbury v.
    • In the presidential election of 1800, Democratic-Republican Thomas Jefferson defeated incumbent Federalist John Adams and became the third president of the United States.
    • In deciding the case of Marbury v.
    • Describe the facts of Marbury v.

  • Interest Groups, Lobbyists, and PACs

    • Federal Election Commission (FEC) regulations limit the amount of money PACs can donate to any one campaign or party, and there are limits to the amount of money they can receive from any one donor.
    • While PACs have existed since the 1940s, the 2010 SpeechNow.org v.
    • Federal Election Commission decision of the Supreme Court created a new form of PAC.
    • The SpeechNow.org case built on the decision in the Citizens United v.
    • Federal Election Commission case earlier in 2010, which held that the First Amendment right to free speech meant that legislatures could not limit independent political spending by corporations and unions.

  • Campaign Finance Reform

    • It was amended in 1974 with the introduction of statutory limits on contributions, and creation of the Federal Election Commission (FEC).
    • These specific election donations are known as ‘hard money. ' The Bipartisan Campaign Reform Act (BCRA) of 2002, is the most recent major federal law on campaign finance, which revised some of the legal limits on expenditures set in 1974, and prohibited unregulated contributions to national political parties.
    • In 1974, fueled by public reaction to the Watergate Scandal, Congress passed amendments to the Act establishing a comprehensive system of regulation and enforcement, including public financing of presidential campaigns and creation of a central enforcement agency, the Federal Election Commission.
    • However, in 1976 Buckley v.
    • In addition, the bill aimed to curtail ads by non-party organizations by banning the use of corporate or union money to pay for "electioneering communications," a term defined as broadcast advertising that identifies a federal candidate within 30 days of a primary or nominating convention, or 60 days of a general election.

  • Presidential Candidates

    • Presidents are usually elected to office by a democratic election.
    • Likewise, elections can also depend on the candidate winning a certain proportion of a vote as determined by election guidelines.
    • The 2010 Supreme Court decision in the case of Citizens United v.
    • Federal Election Commission further paved the way for large campaign contributions by allowing unlimited contributions to so-called "super PACs," or political action committees that are not directly connected to candidates.
    • For example, President Barack Obama was the first non-white U.S. president to be elected.

  • Education Policy

    • The landmark Supreme Court case Brown v.
    • Special education was made into federal law in 1975.
    • A commission established in 2006 evaluated higher education, but its recommendations are yet to be fully implemented.
    • Constitution (San Antonio Independent School District v.
    • The state court cases, beginning with the California case of Serrano v.