Examples of group think in the following topics:
-
- Reflective thinking about group work allows students to evaluate both successes and failures of the project and work towards improvement.
- Using reflective thinking in a group setting can allow for intellectual decisions based on defining a problem and using concepts based in logic to select the best solution.
- What did the group do well?
- Was our group successful?
- Reflective thinking is an excellent tool for identifying positive and negative aspects of a group work experience.
-
- In a sense, all networks are composed of groups (or sub-graphs).
- When two actors have a tie, they form a "group."
- One approach to thinking about the group structure of a network begins with this most basic group, and seeks to see how far this kind of close relationship can be extended.
- This is a useful way of thinking, because sometimes more complex social structures evolve, or emerge, from very simple ones.
- We will turn our attention first to "bottom-up" thinking.
-
- That is, sometimes we think of ourselves as "us" vs.
- "they", and at other times we think of ourselves as "I" vs.
- In other words, sometimes we think of ourselves as group members and at other times we think of ourselves as unique individuals.
- What is crucial for our purposes is that thinking of yourself as a group member and thinking of yourself as a unique individual are both parts of your self-concept.
- Thinking about individuals in one's outgroup in such a fashion allows the individual to believe that the enemy is deserving of death by dehumanizing them (more on this below).
-
- Many different types of groups attempt to influence United States policy.
- For instance, certain demographic groups may favor policies that benefit them the most.
- Other groups may create formal institutions, known as think tanks, to advance their cause.
- Foreign governments can also behave as interest groups when it comes to U.S. foreign policy.
- Because of the wide variety of special interest groups, conflict between groups on an issue is common.
-
- The essential skill of critical thinking will go a long way in helping one to develop statistical literacy.
- The essential skill of critical thinking will go a long way in helping one to develop statistical literacy.
- There is a reasonable level of consensus that an individual or group engaged in strong critical thinking gives due consideration to establish:
- Critical thinking is an inherent part of data analysis and statistical literacy.
- Interpret the role that the process of critical thinking plays in statistical literacy.
-
- Group decision making can lead to improved outcomes, but only if a variety of conditions pertaining to group chemistry are satisfied.
- Group decisions are subject to factors such as social influence, including peer pressure, and group dynamics.
- The sharing of information among group members is another advantage of the group decision-making process.
- Group decisions take into account a broader scope of information since each group member may contribute unique information and expertise.
- Loyalty to the group requires individuals to avoid raising controversial issues or alternative solutions, and there is a loss of individual creativity, uniqueness, and independent thinking.
-
- Group dynamics, which involves the influence of social behavior, is the primary determining factor in the success of group outcomes.
- Group cohesion, or positive feelings between individuals and productive working relationships, contributes to effective group decision making.
- Loyalty to the group requires individuals to avoid raising controversial issues or alternative solutions, and there is a loss of individual creativity, uniqueness, and independent thinking.
- Each member should discuss the group's ideas with trusted people outside of the group.
- The group should invite outside experts into meetings.
-
- Critical thinking skills are essential and connected to the ability to listen effectively and process the information that one hears.
- Critical thinking has many practical applications, such as formulating a workable solution to a complex personal problem, deliberating in a group setting about what course of action to take, or analyzing the assumptions and methods used in arriving at a scientific hypothesis.
- People use critical thinking to solve complex math problems or compare prices at the grocery store.
- Critical thinking is imperative to effective communication, and thus, public speaking.
- Therefore, critical thinkers must engage in highly active listening to further their critical thinking skills.
-
- All teams are groups of individuals, but not all groups are teams.
- While all teams are groups of individuals, not all groups are teams.
- Groups can range greatly in size and scope.
- Groups can exist as a matter of fact; for example, a group can be comprised of people of the same race or ethnic background.
- While such meetings typically have an agenda and thus a purpose and some structure, we would not necessarily think of those in attendance as a team.
-
- Two groups of rats were tested.
- Both groups were injected with chemicals known to increase the chance of liver cancer.
- The experimental group was fed saffron (n = 24) whereas the control group was not (n = 8).
- Only 4 of the 24 subjects in the saffron group developed cancer as compared to 6 of the 8 subjects in the control group.
- What method could be used to test whether this difference between the experimental and control groups is statistically significant?